douxingsuo8809 2017-04-07 16:09
浏览 155
已采纳

是否应该将protobuf用作处理或仅用于传输的数据类型?

I have a matrix struct written in Go. That matrix struct has a bunch of methods. I want to be able to efficiently compute matrix operations but I also want to be able to send it over the wire in order to distribute the computation.

I currently have the matrix and its methods separate from the protobuf definition. When I need to send it over the wire I have to create a new pb.Matrix{} from the existing Matrix{} struct and then make my grpc call. That seems like a waste. So, is it a waste? And should I just be defining my matrix struct as a protobuf definition and then use embedding to define operations on it? Or is it better to keep them separate from each other?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dongyanfeng0546 2017-04-08 08:12
    关注

    In terms of architecture, I'd keep them separate. That would agree with the Single Responsibility Principle. In one of my projects we use this form:

    type Foo struct { ... }
    
    func NewFooFromProto(f *myproto.Foo) *Foo { ... }
    
    func (f *Foo) ToProto() *myproto.Foo { ... }
    
    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 rs485的上拉下拉,不会对a-b<-200mv有影响吗,就是接受时,对判断逻辑0有影响吗
  • ¥15 使用phpstudy在云服务器上搭建个人网站
  • ¥15 应该如何判断含间隙的曲柄摇杆机构,轴与轴承是否发生了碰撞?
  • ¥15 vue3+express部署到nginx
  • ¥20 搭建pt1000三线制高精度测温电路
  • ¥15 使用Jdk8自带的算法,和Jdk11自带的加密结果会一样吗,不一样的话有什么解决方案,Jdk不能升级的情况
  • ¥15 画两个图 python或R
  • ¥15 在线请求openmv与pixhawk 实现实时目标跟踪的具体通讯方法
  • ¥15 八路抢答器设计出现故障
  • ¥15 opencv 无法读取视频