妄徒之命 2009-06-12 10:23 采纳率: 100%
浏览 705
已采纳

如何通过引用传递变量?

The Python documentation seems unclear about whether parameters are passed by reference or value, and the following code produces the unchanged value 'Original'

class PassByReference:
    def __init__(self):
        self.variable = 'Original'
        self.change(self.variable)
        print(self.variable)

    def change(self, var):
        var = 'Changed'

Is there something I can do to pass the variable by actual reference?

转载于:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/986006/how-do-i-pass-a-variable-by-reference

  • 写回答

21条回答 默认 最新

  • 乱世@小熊 2009-06-12 11:18
    关注

    Arguments are passed by assignment. The rationale behind this is twofold:

    1. the parameter passed in is actually a reference to an object (but the reference is passed by value)
    2. some data types are mutable, but others aren't

    So:

    • If you pass a mutable object into a method, the method gets a reference to that same object and you can mutate it to your heart's delight, but if you rebind the reference in the method, the outer scope will know nothing about it, and after you're done, the outer reference will still point at the original object.

    • If you pass an immutable object to a method, you still can't rebind the outer reference, and you can't even mutate the object.

    To make it even more clear, let's have some examples.

    List - a mutable type

    Let's try to modify the list that was passed to a method:

    def try_to_change_list_contents(the_list):
        print('got', the_list)
        the_list.append('four')
        print('changed to', the_list)
    
    outer_list = ['one', 'two', 'three']
    
    print('before, outer_list =', outer_list)
    try_to_change_list_contents(outer_list)
    print('after, outer_list =', outer_list)
    

    Output:

    before, outer_list = ['one', 'two', 'three']
    got ['one', 'two', 'three']
    changed to ['one', 'two', 'three', 'four']
    after, outer_list = ['one', 'two', 'three', 'four']
    

    Since the parameter passed in is a reference to outer_list, not a copy of it, we can use the mutating list methods to change it and have the changes reflected in the outer scope.

    Now let's see what happens when we try to change the reference that was passed in as a parameter:

    def try_to_change_list_reference(the_list):
        print('got', the_list)
        the_list = ['and', 'we', 'can', 'not', 'lie']
        print('set to', the_list)
    
    outer_list = ['we', 'like', 'proper', 'English']
    
    print('before, outer_list =', outer_list)
    try_to_change_list_reference(outer_list)
    print('after, outer_list =', outer_list)
    

    Output:

    before, outer_list = ['we', 'like', 'proper', 'English']
    got ['we', 'like', 'proper', 'English']
    set to ['and', 'we', 'can', 'not', 'lie']
    after, outer_list = ['we', 'like', 'proper', 'English']
    

    Since the the_list parameter was passed by value, assigning a new list to it had no effect that the code outside the method could see. The the_list was a copy of the outer_list reference, and we had the_list point to a new list, but there was no way to change where outer_list pointed.

    String - an immutable type

    It's immutable, so there's nothing we can do to change the contents of the string

    Now, let's try to change the reference

    def try_to_change_string_reference(the_string):
        print('got', the_string)
        the_string = 'In a kingdom by the sea'
        print('set to', the_string)
    
    outer_string = 'It was many and many a year ago'
    
    print('before, outer_string =', outer_string)
    try_to_change_string_reference(outer_string)
    print('after, outer_string =', outer_string)
    

    Output:

    before, outer_string = It was many and many a year ago
    got It was many and many a year ago
    set to In a kingdom by the sea
    after, outer_string = It was many and many a year ago
    

    Again, since the the_string parameter was passed by value, assigning a new string to it had no effect that the code outside the method could see. The the_string was a copy of the outer_string reference, and we had the_string point to a new string, but there was no way to change where outer_string pointed.

    I hope this clears things up a little.

    EDIT: It's been noted that this doesn't answer the question that @David originally asked, "Is there something I can do to pass the variable by actual reference?". Let's work on that.

    How do we get around this?

    As @Andrea's answer shows, you could return the new value. This doesn't change the way things are passed in, but does let you get the information you want back out:

    def return_a_whole_new_string(the_string):
        new_string = something_to_do_with_the_old_string(the_string)
        return new_string
    
    # then you could call it like
    my_string = return_a_whole_new_string(my_string)
    

    If you really wanted to avoid using a return value, you could create a class to hold your value and pass it into the function or use an existing class, like a list:

    def use_a_wrapper_to_simulate_pass_by_reference(stuff_to_change):
        new_string = something_to_do_with_the_old_string(stuff_to_change[0])
        stuff_to_change[0] = new_string
    
    # then you could call it like
    wrapper = [my_string]
    use_a_wrapper_to_simulate_pass_by_reference(wrapper)
    
    do_something_with(wrapper[0])
    

    Although this seems a little cumbersome.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(20条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 求daily translation(DT)偏差订正方法的代码
  • ¥15 js调用html页面需要隐藏某个按钮
  • ¥15 ads仿真结果在圆图上是怎么读数的
  • ¥20 Cotex M3的调试和程序执行方式是什么样的?
  • ¥20 java项目连接sqlserver时报ssl相关错误
  • ¥15 一道python难题3
  • ¥15 牛顿斯科特系数表表示
  • ¥15 arduino 步进电机
  • ¥20 程序进入HardFault_Handler
  • ¥15 关于#python#的问题:自动化测试