dongshendie8849 2011-10-25 13:17
浏览 34
已采纳

mysql按非常大的数字排序行。 加载时间

I'm facing a dilemma. I pull data from my table by two fields:

**field 1**             
1979385197241 
1235467
95823352353
9089892189735

versus

**field 2**
6
2
7
2
1

Lets say the table has about 2000 rows and 40 fields. Would the loading time vary significantly should I order it by one or the other field?

I'm asking because the bigger numbers are live, and the smaller ones are updated by a cronjob by the bigger numbers. If I were to order the rows by field 2, I'd have live results. No need for a cronjob.

  • 写回答

3条回答 默认 最新

  • doumao6212 2011-10-25 13:29
    关注

    Ordering by numbers is a binary comparison operation and will happen in equal time for anything up to the processor's integer size (usually 32 bit). In either case, both numbers are probably compared in a single processor instruction (Intel assembly: cmp. Time to load register and check value not withstanding...). Only on a 32 bit system with a 64 bit number AND with the first 32 bits of both numbers being the same would it take more time to compare the larger number to the smaller one. All sorting operations are done by comparing two numbers at a time.

    In practical terms, never worry about the size of a number that you're sorting. 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 cmp 1 -- same amount of time as 2 cmp 1 -- we know right away that we don't have to check the full length of the first string of 9s.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(2条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 安卓adb backup备份应用数据失败
  • ¥15 eclipse运行项目时遇到的问题
  • ¥15 关于#c##的问题:最近需要用CAT工具Trados进行一些开发
  • ¥15 南大pa1 小游戏没有界面,并且报了如下错误,尝试过换显卡驱动,但是好像不行
  • ¥15 没有证书,nginx怎么反向代理到只能接受https的公网网站
  • ¥50 成都蓉城足球俱乐部小程序抢票
  • ¥15 yolov7训练自己的数据集
  • ¥15 esp8266与51单片机连接问题(标签-单片机|关键词-串口)(相关搜索:51单片机|单片机|测试代码)
  • ¥15 电力市场出清matlab yalmip kkt 双层优化问题
  • ¥30 ros小车路径规划实现不了,如何解决?(操作系统-ubuntu)