douliang6563 2015-05-01 02:59
浏览 56
已采纳

并发写入文件

In go, how can I control the concurrent writing to a text file?

I ask this because I will have multiple goroutines writing to a text file using the same file handler.

I wrote this bit of code to try and see what happens but I'm not sure if I did it "right":

package main

import (
    "os"
    "sync"
    "fmt"
    "time"
    "math/rand"
    "math"
)


func WriteToFile( i int, f *os.File, w *sync.WaitGroup ){
    //sleep for either 200 or 201 milliseconds
    randSleep := int( math.Floor( 200 + ( 2 * rand.Float64() ) ) )
    fmt.Printf( "Thread %d waiting %d
", i, randSleep )
    time.Sleep( time.Duration(randSleep) * time.Millisecond )

    //write to the file
    fmt.Fprintf( f, "Printing out: %d
", i )
    //write to stdout
    fmt.Printf( "Printing out: %d
", i )
    w.Done()
}

func main() {
    rand.Seed( time.Now().UnixNano() )

    d, err := os.Getwd()
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Println( err )
    }
    filename := d + "/log.txt"

    f, err := os.OpenFile( filename, os.O_CREATE | os.O_WRONLY | os.O_TRUNC, 0666 )

    if err != nil {
        fmt.Println( err )
    }
    var w *sync.WaitGroup = new(sync.WaitGroup)
    w.Add( 10 )

    //start 10 writers to the file
    for i:=1; i <= 10; i++ {
        go WriteToFile( i, f, w )
    }

    //wait for writers to finish
    w.Wait()

}

I half expected that the output would show something like this in the file instead of the coherent output I got:

Printing Printing out: 2
out: 5
Poriuntitng: 6

Essentially, I expected the characters to come out incoherently and interweaved due to a lack of synchronization. Did I not write code that would coax this behavior out? Or is some mechanism during calls to fmt.Fprintf synchronizing the writing?

  • 写回答

2条回答 默认 最新

  • doue2666 2015-05-01 03:46
    关注

    There are many ways to control concurrent access. The easiest is to use a Mutex:

    var mu sync.Mutex
    
    func WriteToFile( i int, f *os.File, w *sync.WaitGroup ){
        mu.Lock()
        defer mu.Unlock()
        // etc...
    }
    

    As to why you're not seeing problems, Go uses operating system calls to implement file access, and those system calls are thread safe (emphasis added):

    According to POSIX.1-2008/SUSv4 Section XSI 2.9.7 ("Thread Interactions with Regular File Operations"):

    All of the following functions shall be atomic with respect to each other in the effects specified in POSIX.1-2008 when they operate on regular files or symbolic links: ...

    Among the APIs subsequently listed are write() and writev(2). And among the effects that should be atomic across threads (and processes) are updates of the file offset. However, on Linux before version 3.14, this was not the case: if two processes that share an open file description (see open(2)) perform a write() (or writev(2)) at the same time, then the I/O operations were not atomic with respect updating the file offset, with the result that the blocks of data output by the two processes might (incorrectly) overlap. This problem was fixed in Linux 3.14.

    I would still use a lock though, since Go code is not automatically thread safe. (two goroutines modifying the same variable will result in strange behavior)

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(1条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 根据以下文字信息,做EA模型图
  • ¥15 删除虚拟显示器驱动 删除所有 Xorg 配置文件 删除显示器缓存文件 重启系统 可是依旧无法退出虚拟显示器
  • ¥15 vscode程序一直报同样的错,如何解决?
  • ¥15 关于使用unity中遇到的问题
  • ¥15 开放世界如何写线性关卡的用例(类似原神)
  • ¥15 关于并联谐振电磁感应加热
  • ¥60 请查询全国几个煤炭大省近十年的煤炭铁路及公路的货物周转量
  • ¥15 请帮我看看我这道c语言题到底漏了哪种情况吧!
  • ¥60 关机时蓝屏并显示KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED,怎么修?
  • ¥66 如何制作支付宝扫码跳转到发红包界面