dt3674 2015-09-29 09:39
浏览 283
已采纳

WaitGroup.Wait()的超时

What is an idiomatic way to assign a timeout to WaitGroup.Wait() ?

The reason I want to do this, is to safeguard my 'scheduler' from potentially awaiting an errant 'worker' for ever. This leads to some philosophical questions (i.e. how can the system reliably continue once it has errant workers?), but I think that's out of scope for this question.

I have an answer which I'll provide. Now that I've written it down, it doesn't seem so bad but it still feels more convoluted than it ought to. I'd like to know if there's something available which is simpler, more idiomatic, or even an alternative approach which doesn't use WaitGroups.

Ta.

  • 写回答

4条回答 默认 最新

  • dsapkqaduj6718493 2015-09-29 12:12
    关注

    Mostly your solution you posted below is as good as it can get. Couple of tips to improve it:

    • Alternatively you may close the channel to signal completion instead of sending a value on it, a receive operation on a closed channel can always proceed immediately.
    • And it's better to use defer statement to signal completion, it is executed even if a function terminates abruptly.
    • Also if there is only one "job" to wait for, you can completely omit the WaitGroup and just send a value or close the channel when job is complete (the same channel you use in your select statement).
    • Specifying 1 second duration is as simple as: timeout := time.Second. Specifying 2 seconds for example is: timeout := 2 * time.Second. You don't need the conversion, time.Second is already of type time.Duration, multiplying it with an untyped constant like 2 will also yield a value of type time.Duration.

    I would also create a helper / utility function wrapping this functionality. Note that WaitGroup must be passed as a pointer else the copy will not get "notified" of the WaitGroup.Done() calls. Something like:

    // waitTimeout waits for the waitgroup for the specified max timeout.
    // Returns true if waiting timed out.
    func waitTimeout(wg *sync.WaitGroup, timeout time.Duration) bool {
        c := make(chan struct{})
        go func() {
            defer close(c)
            wg.Wait()
        }()
        select {
        case <-c:
            return false // completed normally
        case <-time.After(timeout):
            return true // timed out
        }
    }
    

    Using it:

    if waitTimeout(&wg, time.Second) {
        fmt.Println("Timed out waiting for wait group")
    } else {
        fmt.Println("Wait group finished")
    }
    

    Try it on the Go Playground.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(3条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 R语言Rstudio突然无法启动
  • ¥15 关于#matlab#的问题:提取2个图像的变量作为另外一个图像像元的移动量,计算新的位置创建新的图像并提取第二个图像的变量到新的图像
  • ¥15 改算法,照着压缩包里边,参考其他代码封装的格式 写到main函数里
  • ¥15 用windows做服务的同志有吗
  • ¥60 求一个简单的网页(标签-安全|关键词-上传)
  • ¥35 lstm时间序列共享单车预测,loss值优化,参数优化算法
  • ¥15 Python中的request,如何使用ssr节点,通过代理requests网页。本人在泰国,需要用大陆ip才能玩网页游戏,合法合规。
  • ¥100 为什么这个恒流源电路不能恒流?
  • ¥15 有偿求跨组件数据流路径图
  • ¥15 写一个方法checkPerson,入参实体类Person,出参布尔值