doujiu3768 2013-08-30 01:18
浏览 62
已采纳

可以安全地重用sync.WaitGroup吗?

Can sync.WaitGroup be reused after Wait() is called?

func worker(who string, in <-chan int, wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
    for i := range in {
        fmt.Println(who, i)
        wg.Done()
    }
}

func main() {
    var wg sync.WaitGroup

    AIn := make(chan int, 1)
    BIn := make(chan int, 1)

    go worker("a:", AIn, &wg)
    go worker("b:", BIn, &wg)

    for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
        wg.Add(2)
        AIn <- i
        BIn <- i
        wg.Wait()
        fmt.Println("main:", i)
    }
}

This play.golang.org/p/QLsvA-b4Ae runs as expected, but is it guaranteed to be safe? The documentation doesn't say so, but maybe I'm just being paranoid.

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • drby30217 2013-08-30 02:34
    关注

    Yes, it is safe. In fact, it is even safer than that. You can Wait from multiple goroutines concurrently, and interchange Add and Done calls as appropriate for your use case. As long as the Add happens before the Wait, you should be safe.

    Just out of curiosity, right now the WaitGroup is implemented with a mutex, two int32s counters, and a semaphore:

    type WaitGroup struct {
            m       Mutex
            counter int32
            waiters int32
            sema    *uint32
    }
    

    This is also an interesting test:

    var wg1, wg2 sync.WaitGroup
    wg1.Add(1)
    wg1.Done()
    wg1.Wait()
    fmt.Println(wg1 == wg2) // Prints true
    

    Finally, if you do find any issues with that kind of use, please report as it would be a bug.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 delta降尺度计算的一些细节,有偿
  • ¥15 Arduino红外遥控代码有问题
  • ¥15 数值计算离散正交多项式
  • ¥30 数值计算均差系数编程
  • ¥15 redis-full-check比较 两个集群的数据出错
  • ¥15 Matlab编程问题
  • ¥15 训练的多模态特征融合模型准确度很低怎么办
  • ¥15 kylin启动报错log4j类冲突
  • ¥15 超声波模块测距控制点灯,灯的闪烁很不稳定,经过调试发现测的距离偏大
  • ¥15 import arcpy出现importing _arcgisscripting 找不到相关程序