dongzhang1987 2016-03-27 15:12
浏览 299
已采纳

我应该直接在golang中使用ServeMux还是http

I was wondering if I should create a new ServeMux and register it to the http.Server or should I invoke http.HandleFunc and http.Handler directly?

I think the route with a ServeMux is better because http.HandleFunc obviously messes with the global state of the HTTP package, which is considered bad practice in Go. However, in many tutorials, even the official ones, I often see the http.HandleFunc route being used.

This makes me wonder: why should one use http.HandleFunc when there is a ServeMux? I know that ServeMux has some advantages (e.g. you can nest it without repeating the prefix all the time) but I wonder why I should ever choose http.HandleFunc over Multiplexer, especially since HandleFunc uses a ServeMux internally.

Edit: as promised in the comments, I've asked to deprecate the additional (and useless IMO functions) on Golang-dev and they said no (well, on person said no). Here is the link.

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • drxp993551 2016-03-27 15:24
    关注

    You're on the right track: you should prefer to instantiate your own ServeMux, for the reasons you've outlined.

    Using DefaultServeMux also runs the risk of exposing profiling endpoints when using net/http/pprof, since those are attached to the DefaultServeMux.

    http.Handle|HandleFunc are convenience methods, and perhaps useful for keeping the boilerplate in example code down, but creating a ServeMux gives you the ability to wrap it, nest it within another, export it from a constructor, etc.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 YoloV5 第三方库的版本对照问题
  • ¥15 请完成下列相关问题!
  • ¥15 drone 推送镜像时候 purge: true 推送完毕后没有删除对应的镜像,手动拷贝到服务器执行结果正确在样才能让指令自动执行成功删除对应镜像,如何解决?
  • ¥15 求daily translation(DT)偏差订正方法的代码
  • ¥15 js调用html页面需要隐藏某个按钮
  • ¥15 ads仿真结果在圆图上是怎么读数的
  • ¥20 Cotex M3的调试和程序执行方式是什么样的?
  • ¥20 java项目连接sqlserver时报ssl相关错误
  • ¥15 一道python难题3
  • ¥15 牛顿斯科特系数表表示