dtw52353 2016-08-19 08:09
浏览 828
已采纳

Golang的net / rpc软件包和gRPC框架有什么区别?

gRPC is a "general RPC framework" which uses ProtoBuffer to serialize and deserialize while the net/rpc package seems could do "nearly" the same thing with encoding/gob and both are under the umbrella of Google.
So what's the difference between them? What pros and cons dose choosing one of them have?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • doujiena0025 2016-08-19 08:37
    关注

    Well, you have said it yourself. gRPC is a framework that uses RPC to communicate. RPC is not Protobuf but instead Protobuf can use RPC and gRPC is actually Protobuf over RPC.

    You don't need to use Protobuf to create RPC services within your app. This is a good idea if you are doing libraries/apps from small to medium size. Also you don't need to learn the syntax of Protobuf to create your own services.

    But, Protobuf is much faster than REST. It is a much more convenient way to communicate with the downside of the learning curve of the Protobuf syntax. Also, you can use Protobuf to generate the codebase in more languages than simply Go. So if you have some kind of service in Java, you can use Protobuf to generate RPC calls between them easily while if you use the net/rpc package you'll have to implement them twice (once in Go and once in Java)

    In general, I will use Protobuf to nearly all. This gives you confidence to use it at more large scale or complex projects.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 Fluent齿轮搅油
  • ¥15 八爪鱼爬数据为什么自己停了
  • ¥15 交替优化波束形成和ris反射角使保密速率最大化
  • ¥15 树莓派与pix飞控通信
  • ¥15 自动转发微信群信息到另外一个微信群
  • ¥15 outlook无法配置成功
  • ¥30 这是哪个作者做的宝宝起名网站
  • ¥60 版本过低apk如何修改可以兼容新的安卓系统
  • ¥25 由IPR导致的DRIVER_POWER_STATE_FAILURE蓝屏
  • ¥50 有数据,怎么建立模型求影响全要素生产率的因素