Does it make sense to additionally use http.TimeoutHandler if I already set the server's ReadTimeout and WriteTimeout? It seems as if this scenario is mutually exclusive?
3条回答 默认 最新
- dongmi1995 2018-07-10 07:16关注
These two deal with different aspects of http request/response lifecycle.
http.TimeoutHandler
is used to limit execution time of the http.Handler. it will return503
status code to the client, ifhttp.Handler
doesn't finish in stipulated time.While,
ReadTimeout
andWriteTimeout
deals with network I/O timeout, i.e time required to read/write request/response body to your client respectively.So,
http.TimeoutHandler
handles the case where your handler (code block that handles http request) need to be complete in set amount of time, by wrapping your original handler. whilehttp.WriteTimeout
orhttp.ReadTimeout
is used when you dont want to wait for network read/write of request/response indefinitely.本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?解决 无用评论 打赏 举报
悬赏问题
- ¥15 asp.textbox后台赋值前端不能显示什么原因
- ¥15 宇视监控服务器无法登录
- ¥15 PADS Logic 原理图
- ¥15 PADS Logic 图标
- ¥15 电脑和power bi环境都是英文如何将日期层次结构转换成英文
- ¥15 DruidDataSource一直closing
- ¥20 气象站点数据求取中~
- ¥15 如何获取APP内弹出的网址链接
- ¥15 wifi 图标不见了 不知道怎么办 上不了网 变成小地球了
- ¥50 STM32单片机传感器读取错误