douhui4699 2014-04-24 12:27
浏览 23
已采纳

以高效的方式递归列出目录和文件

go's filepath.Walk says that

The files are walked in lexical order, which makes the output deterministic but means that for very large directories Walk can be inefficient. Walk does not follow symbolic links.

What are the other efficient ways to do the same?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dpw30157 2014-04-24 12:44
    关注

    There is no "efficient" way to do the same (walk in lexical order). You either have to sort (which is "inefficient") or walk in random order (which is not the same).

    Until you measured and using filepath.Walk really is your bottleneck you should not worry about the little word "inefficient". Especially as it does not state "it will be inefficient", just "can be". Can in the sense of: It is possible to craft 100k file names and put the into a manually crafted directory so that sorting them will take a long time.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 C#读写EXCEL文件,不同编译
  • ¥15 如何提取csv文件中需要的列,将其整合为一篇完整文档,并进行jieba分词(语言-python)
  • ¥15 MapReduce结果输出到HBase,一直连接不上MySQL
  • ¥15 扩散模型sd.webui使用时报错“Nonetype”
  • ¥15 stm32流水灯+呼吸灯+外部中断按键
  • ¥15 将二维数组,按照假设的规定,如0/1/0 == "4",把对应列位置写成一个字符并打印输出该字符
  • ¥15 NX MCD仿真与博途通讯不了啥情况
  • ¥15 win11家庭中文版安装docker遇到Hyper-V启用失败解决办法整理
  • ¥15 gradio的web端页面格式不对的问题
  • ¥15 求大家看看Nonce如何配置