douhui4699 2014-04-24 12:27
浏览 23
已采纳

以高效的方式递归列出目录和文件

go's filepath.Walk says that

The files are walked in lexical order, which makes the output deterministic but means that for very large directories Walk can be inefficient. Walk does not follow symbolic links.

What are the other efficient ways to do the same?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dpw30157 2014-04-24 12:44
    关注

    There is no "efficient" way to do the same (walk in lexical order). You either have to sort (which is "inefficient") or walk in random order (which is not the same).

    Until you measured and using filepath.Walk really is your bottleneck you should not worry about the little word "inefficient". Especially as it does not state "it will be inefficient", just "can be". Can in the sense of: It is possible to craft 100k file names and put the into a manually crafted directory so that sorting them will take a long time.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 做个有关计算的小程序
  • ¥15 MPI读取tif文件无法正常给各进程分配路径
  • ¥15 如何用MATLAB实现以下三个公式(有相互嵌套)
  • ¥30 关于#算法#的问题:运用EViews第九版本进行一系列计量经济学的时间数列数据回归分析预测问题 求各位帮我解答一下
  • ¥15 setInterval 页面闪烁,怎么解决
  • ¥15 如何让企业微信机器人实现消息汇总整合
  • ¥50 关于#ui#的问题:做yolov8的ui界面出现的问题
  • ¥15 如何用Python爬取各高校教师公开的教育和工作经历
  • ¥15 TLE9879QXA40 电机驱动
  • ¥20 对于工程问题的非线性数学模型进行线性化