dp13668681869 2018-07-05 03:18
浏览 59
已采纳

直径:支持针对不同网络提供商(即爱立信,诺基亚)和不同节点(即GGSN,Tango)的不同AVP词典

We are working on creating a diameter adapter for OCS. Currently our AVP dictionary is as supplied by go-diameter.

We are trying to Provide a configurable dictionary to support Following

  • Vendor Specific AVPs to support different network providers, like Nokia and Ericsson
  • Support for different Network traffic, like VoLTE, GGSN, Tango.

Following are the two approaches that we are currently thinking on.

  • Include a single dictionary with all supported AVPs and have a single release of diameter adapter. The intelligence to be build inside the code for identifying which AVPs are required for which node.
  • Have different releases for each dictionary that we want to support, and deploy which ever is required by the service provider.

I have search over the internet to see if something similar has been done as a proof of concept. Need help in identifying which is better solution for implementation.

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • doutou7286 2018-07-05 13:36
    关注

    Im not familiar with go-diameter but My suggestion: Use one dictionary

    This dictionary should be used by all vendors and providers.

    Reasons:

    1. You dont know how many different releases you will end up with and you might need to support many dictionaries at the end.
    2. If you use few dictionaries most of the AVPs will be the same on all
    3. As bigger as your one dictionary will be you will support more AVPs everywhere and you never 100% sure which AVP might arrive from different clients
    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥30 关于#算法#的问题:运用EViews第九版本进行一系列计量经济学的时间数列数据回归分析预测问题 求各位帮我解答一下
  • ¥15 setInterval 页面闪烁,怎么解决
  • ¥15 如何让企业微信机器人实现消息汇总整合
  • ¥50 关于#ui#的问题:做yolov8的ui界面出现的问题
  • ¥15 如何用Python爬取各高校教师公开的教育和工作经历
  • ¥15 TLE9879QXA40 电机驱动
  • ¥20 对于工程问题的非线性数学模型进行线性化
  • ¥15 Mirare PLUS 进行密钥认证?(详解)
  • ¥15 物体双站RCS和其组成阵列后的双站RCS关系验证
  • ¥20 想用ollama做一个自己的AI数据库