dongshai2022 2018-03-12 15:14 采纳率: 100%
浏览 100
已采纳

使用golang诊断从unix套接字读取的速度非常慢(netcat中1分钟vs 1秒)

Background Im writing a few packages to communicate with the OpenVas vulnerability scanner - the scanner uses a few different propitiatory protocols to communicate - are all comprised of either xml or text strings sent over a unix socket or tcp connection (im using unix socket).

The issue I'm having is with the OTP protocol (OpenVas internal protocol which is not well documented)

I can run the following command using netcat and I will get a response back in under a second:

echo -en '< OTP/2.0 > CLIENT <|> NVT_INFO ' | ncat -U /var/run/openvassd.sock

This results in a fairly large response which looks like this in terminal:

< OTP/2.0 >
SERVER <|> NVT_INFO <|> 201802131248 <|> SERVER
SERVER <|> PREFERENCES <|>
cache_folder <|> /var/cache/openvas
include_folders <|> /var/lib/openvas/plugins
max_hosts <|> 30
//lots more here

So for example, I previously had some code like this for reading the response back:

func (c Client) read() ([]byte, error) {

    // set up buffer to read in chunks
    bufSize := 8096
    resp := []byte{}
    buf := make([]byte, bufSize)

    for {
        n, err := c.conn.Read(buf)
        resp = append(resp, buf[:n]...)
        if err != nil {
            if err != io.EOF {
                return resp, fmt.Errorf("read error: %s", err)
            }
            break
        }
        fmt.Println("got", n, "bytes.")

    }
    fmt.Println("total response size:", len(resp))

    return resp, nil
}

I get the full result but it comes in small pieces (i guess line by line) so the output I see is something like this (over the course of a minute or so before showing full response):

got 53 bytes.
got 62 bytes.
got 55 bytes.
got 62 bytes.
got 64 bytes.
got 59 bytes.
got 58 bytes.
got 54 bytes.
got 54 bytes.
got 54 bytes.
got 64 bytes.
got 59 bytes.
... (more)

SO I decided to try ioutil.ReadAll:

func (c Client) read() ([]byte, error) {
    fmt.Println("read start")
    d, err := ioutil.ReadAll(c.conn)
    fmt.Println("read done")
    return d, err
}

This does again return the full response, but the time between "read start" and "read done" is around a minute compared to the < 1sec the command is expected to take.

Any thoughts on why the read via golang is so slow compared to netcat - how can I diagnose/fix the issue?**

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • duankezong4064 2018-03-12 17:37
    关注

    It appears the service is waiting for more input, and eventually times out after a minute. In your CLI example, once the echo command completes that side of the pipe is shutdown for writes, in which case the service is notified by a 0-length recv.

    In order to do the same in Go, you need to call CloseWrite on the net.UnixConn after you have completed sending the command.

    c.conn.(*net.UnixConn).CloseWrite()
    
    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥100 c语言,请帮蒟蒻写一个题的范例作参考
  • ¥15 名为“Product”的列已属于此 DataTable
  • ¥15 安卓adb backup备份应用数据失败
  • ¥15 eclipse运行项目时遇到的问题
  • ¥15 关于#c##的问题:最近需要用CAT工具Trados进行一些开发
  • ¥15 南大pa1 小游戏没有界面,并且报了如下错误,尝试过换显卡驱动,但是好像不行
  • ¥15 没有证书,nginx怎么反向代理到只能接受https的公网网站
  • ¥50 成都蓉城足球俱乐部小程序抢票
  • ¥15 yolov7训练自己的数据集
  • ¥15 esp8266与51单片机连接问题(标签-单片机|关键词-串口)(相关搜索:51单片机|单片机|测试代码)