doulei6778 2018-05-18 08:07
浏览 20
已采纳

在Go中收到SIGINT时是否调用了延迟函数?

For the snippet below, the deferred call is not made when ^C is received. Is it possible that the cleanup introduces a race condition? If yes, what could be a better pattern of cleanup on receiving an interrupt?

  func fn() {
    // some code
    defer cleanup()
    go func() {
       c := make(chan os.Signal, 1)
       signal.Notify(c, os.Interrupt)

       // Block until a signal is received.
       _ = <-c
       cleanup()
     }
     for {
        // Infinite loop. Returns iff an error is encountered in the 
        // body
     }
}
  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dongqia0240 2018-05-18 08:43
    关注

    Note that if you "install" your signal channel with signal.Notify(), the default behavior will be disabled. This means if you do this, the for loop in your fn() function will not be interrupted, it will continue to run.

    So when you receive a value on your registered channel, you have to make that for loop terminate so you can do a "clean" cleanup. Else the resources cleanup() ought to free might still be used in for, most likely resulting in error or panic.

    Once you do this, you don't even have to call cleanup() manually, because returning from fn() will run the deferred function properly.

    Here's an example:

    var shutdownCh = make(chan struct{})
    
    func fn() {
        defer cleanup()
    
        go func() {
            c := make(chan os.Signal, 1)
            signal.Notify(c, os.Interrupt)
            <-c
            close(shutdownCh)
        }()
    
        for {
            select {
            case <-shutdownCh:
                return
                // Other cases might be listed here..
            default:
            }
            time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
        }
    }
    

    Of course the above example does not guarantee app termination. You should have some code that listens to the shutdownCh and terminates the app. This code should also wait for all goroutines to gracefully finish. For that you may use sync.WaitGroup: add 1 to it when you launch a goroutine that should be waited for on exit, and call WaitGroup.Done() when such a goroutine finishes.

    Also since in a real app there might be lots of these, the signal handling should be moved to a "central" place and not done in each place.

    Here's a complete example how to do that:

    var shutdownCh = make(chan struct{})
    var wg = &sync.WaitGroup{}
    
    func main() {
        wg.Add(1)
        go func() {
            defer wg.Done()
            fn()
        }()
    
        c := make(chan os.Signal, 1)
        signal.Notify(c, os.Interrupt)
        <-c
        close(shutdownCh)
        wg.Wait()
    }
    
    func fn() {
        defer cleanup()
        for {
            select {
            case <-shutdownCh:
                return
                // Other cases might be listed here..
            default:
            }
            fmt.Println("working...")
            time.Sleep(time.Second)
        }
    }
    
    func cleanup() {
        fmt.Println("cleaning up...")
    }
    

    Here's an example output of the above app, when pressing <kbd>CTRL+C</kbd> 3 seconds after its start:

    working...
    working...
    working...
    ^Ccleaning up...
    
    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 MATLAB代码补全插值
  • ¥15 Typegoose 中如何使用 arrayFilters 筛选并更新深度嵌套的子文档数组信息
  • ¥15 前后端分离的学习疑问?
  • ¥15 stata实证代码答疑
  • ¥50 husky+jaco2实现在gazebo与rviz中联合仿真
  • ¥15 dpabi预处理报错:Error using y_ExtractROISignal (line 251)
  • ¥15 在虚拟机中配置flume,无法将slave1节点的文件采集到master节点中
  • ¥15 husky+kinova jaco2 仿真
  • ¥15 zigbee终端设备入网失败
  • ¥15 金融监管系统怎么对7+4机构进行监管的