doucheng9058 2016-05-27 03:43
浏览 232
已采纳

为什么“ pstack”仅打印一个线程的内容?

My OS is RHEL 7, and I run a simple Go program:

package main

import (
    "time"
)

func main() {
    time.Sleep(1000 * time.Second)
}

During its running, I check the thread count of process:

# cat /proc/13858/status | grep Thread
Threads:        5

While using the pstack command shipped on RHEL, it only prints one thread's stack:

# pstack 13858
Thread 1 (process 13858):
#0  runtime.futex () at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/sys_linux_amd64.s:307
#1  0x0000000000422580 in runtime.futexsleep (addr=0x4c7af8 <runtime.timers+24>, val=0, ns=999999997446) at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/os1_linux.go:57
#2  0x000000000040b07b in runtime.notetsleep_internal (n=0x4c7af8 <runtime.timers+24>, ns=999999997446, ~r2=255) at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/lock_futex.go:174
#3  0x000000000040b1e6 in runtime.notetsleepg (n=0x4c7af8 <runtime.timers+24>, ns=999999997446, ~r2=false) at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/lock_futex.go:206
#4  0x000000000043e5de in runtime.timerproc () at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/time.go:209
#5  0x0000000000451001 in runtime.goexit () at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1998
#6  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Why does pstack only print one thread's content?

P.S.: The pstack script is here:

#!/bin/sh

if test $# -ne 1; then
    echo "Usage: `basename $0 .sh` <process-id>" 1>&2
    exit 1
fi

if test ! -r /proc/$1; then
    echo "Process $1 not found." 1>&2
    exit 1
fi

# GDB doesn't allow "thread apply all bt" when the process isn't
# threaded; need to peek at the process to determine if that or the
# simpler "bt" should be used.

backtrace="bt"
if test -d /proc/$1/task ; then
    # Newer kernel; has a task/ directory.
    if test `/bin/ls /proc/$1/task | /usr/bin/wc -l` -gt 1 2>/dev/null ; then
        backtrace="thread apply all bt"
    fi
elif test -f /proc/$1/maps ; then
    # Older kernel; go by it loading libpthread.
    if /bin/grep -e libpthread /proc/$1/maps > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
        backtrace="thread apply all bt"
    fi
fi

GDB=${GDB:-/usr/bin/gdb}

# Run GDB, strip out unwanted noise.
# --readnever is no longer used since .gdb_index is now in use.
$GDB --quiet -nx $GDBARGS /proc/$1/exe $1 <<EOF 2>&1 |
set width 0
set height 0
set pagination no
$backtrace
EOF
/bin/sed -n \
    -e 's/^\((gdb) \)*//' \
    -e '/^#/p' \
    -e '/^Thread/p' 
  • 写回答

2条回答 默认 最新

  • doulu1867 2016-05-27 09:57
    关注

    pstack uses gdb. This is a quote from golang doc (https://golang.org/doc/gdb):

    GDB does not understand Go programs well. The stack management, threading, and runtime contain aspects that differ enough from the execution model GDB expects that they can confuse the debugger, even when the program is compiled with gccgo. As a consequence, although GDB can be useful in some situations, it is not a reliable debugger for Go programs, particularly heavily concurrent ones.

    4 out of 5 threads that you see in /proc are created even before you program enters main. I assume that golang runtime creates them.

    Why does pstack only print one thread's content?

    Judging from output of strace for gdb I see that gdb actually tries to attach to them but after something goes wrong and gdb does not try to inspect these threads. These are syscalls that gdb issued for these runtime threads but due to unknown reason decided stopped investigating them immediately:

    5072  ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, 5023, 0, 0) = 0
    5072  --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
    5072  rt_sigreturn(0x11)                = 0
    5072  ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, 5024, 0, 0) = 0
    5072  --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
    5072  rt_sigreturn(0x11)                = 0
    5072  ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, 5025, 0, 0) = 0
    5072  --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
    5072  rt_sigreturn(0x11)                = 0
    

    However you can inspect them yourself. It seems that these threads belong to golang runtime

    $ pstack 5094
    Thread 1 (process 5094):
    #0  0x0000000000459243 in runtime.futex ()
    #1  0x00000000004271e0 in runtime.futexsleep ()
    #2  0x000000000040d55b in runtime.notetsleep_internal ()
    #3  0x000000000040d64b in runtime.notetsleep ()
    #4  0x0000000000435677 in runtime.sysmon ()
    #5  0x000000000042e6cc in runtime.mstart1 ()
    #6  0x000000000042e5d2 in runtime.mstart ()
    #7  0x00000000004592b7 in runtime.clone ()
    #8  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
    
    $ pstack 5095
    Thread 1 (process 5095):
    #0  0x0000000000459243 in runtime.futex ()
    #1  0x0000000000427143 in runtime.futexsleep ()
    #2  0x000000000040d3f4 in runtime.notesleep ()
    #3  0x000000000042f6eb in runtime.stopm ()
    #4  0x0000000000430a79 in runtime.findrunnable ()
    #5  0x00000000004310ff in runtime.schedule ()
    #6  0x000000000043139b in runtime.park_m ()
    #7  0x0000000000455acb in runtime.mcall ()
    #8  0x000000c820021500 in ?? ()
    #9  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
    
    $ pstack 5096
    Thread 1 (process 5096):
    #0  0x0000000000459243 in runtime.futex ()
    #1  0x0000000000427143 in runtime.futexsleep ()
    #2  0x000000000040d3f4 in runtime.notesleep ()
    #3  0x000000000042f6eb in runtime.stopm ()
    #4  0x000000000042fff7 in runtime.startlockedm ()
    #5  0x0000000000431147 in runtime.schedule ()
    #6  0x000000000043139b in runtime.park_m ()
    #7  0x0000000000455acb in runtime.mcall ()
    #8  0x000000c820020000 in ?? ()
    

    Update for gdb 8.0

    pstack that uses gdb 8.0 correctly prints backtraces for all threas. The command looks like:

    $ GDB=$HOME/bin/gdb pstack  $(pidof main)
    

    And here is its output (shortened):

    $ GDB=$HOME/bin/gdb pstack  $(pidof main) | egrep "^Thread"
    Thread 4 (LWP 18335):
    Thread 3 (LWP 18334):
    Thread 2 (LWP 18333):
    Thread 1 (LWP 18332):
    
    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(1条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 要给毕业设计添加扫码登录的功能!!有偿
  • ¥15 kafka 分区副本增加会导致消息丢失或者不可用吗?
  • ¥15 微信公众号自制会员卡没有收款渠道啊
  • ¥15 stable diffusion
  • ¥100 Jenkins自动化部署—悬赏100元
  • ¥15 关于#python#的问题:求帮写python代码
  • ¥20 MATLAB画图图形出现上下震荡的线条
  • ¥15 关于#windows#的问题:怎么用WIN 11系统的电脑 克隆WIN NT3.51-4.0系统的硬盘
  • ¥15 perl MISA分析p3_in脚本出错
  • ¥15 k8s部署jupyterlab,jupyterlab保存不了文件