dongye9191 2018-11-17 08:27
浏览 150
已采纳

为什么不使用sync.WaitGroup,sync.Mutex引用类型(例如通道,切片)?

If Waitgroups and Mutex always needs to be passed by reference always, can't we make it a reference type (forbid the use of them as pass by value)? I mean is there any use case where we need to use them pass by value?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • duanli0453 2018-11-17 08:34
    关注

    When you pass any argument as value, the value will get copied. Any modification these arguments will be local the the func. When the func exits those changes will be gone.

    In case of a WaitGroup or Mutex you do not want this, as you want to share the state. If all modifications were local, you could not sync anything, as you would have many different copies with different states.

    One valid case could be that you want to copy a WaitGroup or Mutex, but that would be very implicit code and hard for another developer to understand/maintain.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 DS18B20内部ADC模数转换器
  • ¥15 做个有关计算的小程序
  • ¥15 MPI读取tif文件无法正常给各进程分配路径
  • ¥15 如何用MATLAB实现以下三个公式(有相互嵌套)
  • ¥30 关于#算法#的问题:运用EViews第九版本进行一系列计量经济学的时间数列数据回归分析预测问题 求各位帮我解答一下
  • ¥15 setInterval 页面闪烁,怎么解决
  • ¥15 如何让企业微信机器人实现消息汇总整合
  • ¥50 关于#ui#的问题:做yolov8的ui界面出现的问题
  • ¥15 如何用Python爬取各高校教师公开的教育和工作经历
  • ¥15 TLE9879QXA40 电机驱动