dongye9191 2018-11-17 08:27
浏览 150
已采纳

为什么不使用sync.WaitGroup,sync.Mutex引用类型(例如通道,切片)?

If Waitgroups and Mutex always needs to be passed by reference always, can't we make it a reference type (forbid the use of them as pass by value)? I mean is there any use case where we need to use them pass by value?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • duanli0453 2018-11-17 08:34
    关注

    When you pass any argument as value, the value will get copied. Any modification these arguments will be local the the func. When the func exits those changes will be gone.

    In case of a WaitGroup or Mutex you do not want this, as you want to share the state. If all modifications were local, you could not sync anything, as you would have many different copies with different states.

    One valid case could be that you want to copy a WaitGroup or Mutex, but that would be very implicit code and hard for another developer to understand/maintain.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 如何在scanpy上做差异基因和通路富集?
  • ¥20 关于#硬件工程#的问题,请各位专家解答!
  • ¥15 关于#matlab#的问题:期望的系统闭环传递函数为G(s)=wn^2/s^2+2¢wn+wn^2阻尼系数¢=0.707,使系统具有较小的超调量
  • ¥15 FLUENT如何实现在堆积颗粒的上表面加载高斯热源
  • ¥30 截图中的mathematics程序转换成matlab
  • ¥15 动力学代码报错,维度不匹配
  • ¥15 Power query添加列问题
  • ¥50 Kubernetes&Fission&Eleasticsearch
  • ¥15 報錯:Person is not mapped,如何解決?
  • ¥15 c++头文件不能识别CDialog