weixin_39813263
weixin_39813263
2020-12-09 04:27

Solver uses Name of the Elements without using Brand of the Elements

Required Information

Class: Weaver (Specialist) Level: 60 Craftsmanship: 661 Control: 619 CP: 377 Recipe Name: Holy Rainbow Cloth Recipe Level: 52 Solver Seed: 87521

Expected Behaviour

Name of the Elements is used in combination with Brand of the Elements and never on its own.

Actual Behaviour

Name of the Elements is in the macro without Brand of the Elements to go along with it

Steps To Reproduce

I am unsure if any of these settings are different from default so I will show all of them. image

该提问来源于开源项目:doxxx/ffxiv-craft-opt-web

  • 点赞
  • 写回答
  • 关注问题
  • 收藏
  • 复制链接分享
  • 邀请回答

5条回答

  • weixin_39972019 weixin_39972019 5月前

    Name of the Elements has no effect on its own (in our model), so there's two possibilities:

    1. It's a matter of timing -- i.e. the solver needs a "do nothing" action there. Do you have Use Conditions turned on in the Simulator options?
    2. At some point it did have both but evolved the solution such that the Brand action got removed/replaced and the presence of the Name action did not penalize the new solution sufficiently to discard it.

    That said, I don't think we're modeling the effect of Name of the Elements on Brand of the Elements correctly.

    点赞 评论 复制链接分享
  • weixin_39813263 weixin_39813263 5月前

    Use Conditions was enabled during this

    点赞 评论 复制链接分享
  • weixin_39972019 weixin_39972019 5月前

    The model has been improved recently, is this still an issue?

    点赞 评论 复制链接分享
  • weixin_39970855 weixin_39970855 5月前

    Hope I can jump in here with more data. Seems like maybe the simulator has a general problem with preconditions?

    
    Firefox 69.0.3
    Seed: 87628
    
    Crafter:
      Class: Weaver
      Level: 70
      Craftsmanship: 1621
      Control: 1574
      CP: 465
      Specialist: true
    
    Recipe:
      Level: 290
      Difficulty: 2952
      Durability: 80
      Start Quality: 1661
      Max Quality: 13187
      Aspect: none
    
    Settings:
      Max Tricks Uses: 0
      Reliability: 100%
      Use Conditions: true
      Algorithm: eaSimple
      Population: 300
      Generations: 100
      Penalty Weight: 10000
    
    

    Which resulted in...

    
    /ac "Inner Quiet" <wait.2>
    /ac "Steady Hand II" <wait.2>
    /ac "Prudent Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Careful Synthesis III" <wait.3>
    /ac "Steady Hand II" <wait.2>
    /ac "Innovative Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Patient Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Patient Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Advanced Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Comfort Zone" <wait.2>
    /ac "Careful Synthesis III" <wait.3>
    /ac "Careful Synthesis II" <wait.3>
    /ac "Great Strides" <wait.2>
    /ac "Master's Mend II" <wait.3>
    /echo Macro #1 complete <se.1>
    /ac "Observe" <wait.3>
    /ac "Focused Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Careful Synthesis III" <wait.3>
    /ac "Observe" <wait.3>
    /ac "Focused Touch" <wait.3>
    /ac "Careful Synthesis III" <wait.3>
    /ac "Great Strides" <wait.2>
    /ac "Specialty: Reflect" <wait.3>
    /ac "Specialty: Reflect" <wait.3>
    /ac "Byregot's Blessing" <wait.3>
    /ac "Careful Synthesis III" <wait.3>
    /echo Macro #2 complete <se.14>
    </se.14></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.2></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></se.1></wait.3></wait.2></wait.3></wait.3></wait.2></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.3></wait.2></wait.3></wait.3></wait.2></wait.2>

    It's specifically Specialty: Reflect, which would require Initial Preparations to be the 1st action. And would only be used a max of 1 time.

    点赞 评论 复制链接分享
  • weixin_39972019 weixin_39972019 5月前

    No, the model does account for Specialty: Reflect requiring Initial Preparation. In this case, if you look at the Monte Carlo Sim log you'll see that those two actions are "wasted" (the number in the WAC column increases).

    Even with those two wasted actions, the sequence was still the best the solver could come up with during that run. If you continued to run the solver a few more times, it would probably find something better. There's a significant random aspect to the solver so these situations can occur.

    I cannot stress this enough: if you don't like the sequence that the solver came up with, try "Continue" a few more times and if it's still no good, "Reset" and try again.

    点赞 评论 复制链接分享

相关推荐