喵-见缝插针 2008-09-25 21:01 采纳率: 0%
浏览 433
已采纳

@ staticmethod 和@classmethod 的区别是什么?

What is the difference between a function decorated with @staticmethod and one decorated with @classmethod?

转载于:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/136097/what-is-the-difference-between-staticmethod-and-classmethod

  • 写回答

24条回答 默认 最新

  • MAO-EYE 2009-11-03 19:13
    关注

    Maybe a bit of example code will help: Notice the difference in the call signatures of foo, class_foo and static_foo:

    class A(object):
        def foo(self,x):
            print "executing foo(%s,%s)"%(self,x)
    
        @classmethod
        def class_foo(cls,x):
            print "executing class_foo(%s,%s)"%(cls,x)
    
        @staticmethod
        def static_foo(x):
            print "executing static_foo(%s)"%x    
    
    a=A()
    

    Below is the usual way an object instance calls a method. The object instance, a, is implicitly passed as the first argument.

    a.foo(1)
    # executing foo(<__main__.A object at 0xb7dbef0c>,1)
    

    With classmethods, the class of the object instance is implicitly passed as the first argument instead of self.

    a.class_foo(1)
    # executing class_foo(<class '__main__.A'>,1)
    

    You can also call class_foo using the class. In fact, if you define something to be a classmethod, it is probably because you intend to call it from the class rather than from a class instance. A.foo(1) would have raised a TypeError, but A.class_foo(1) works just fine:

    A.class_foo(1)
    # executing class_foo(<class '__main__.A'>,1)
    

    One use people have found for class methods is to create inheritable alternative constructors.


    With staticmethods, neither self (the object instance) nor cls (the class) is implicitly passed as the first argument. They behave like plain functions except that you can call them from an instance or the class:

    a.static_foo(1)
    # executing static_foo(1)
    
    A.static_foo('hi')
    # executing static_foo(hi)
    

    Staticmethods are used to group functions which have some logical connection with a class to the class.


    foo is just a function, but when you call a.foo you don't just get the function, you get a "partially applied" version of the function with the object instance a bound as the first argument to the function. foo expects 2 arguments, while a.foo only expects 1 argument.

    a is bound to foo. That is what is meant by the term "bound" below:

    print(a.foo)
    # <bound method A.foo of <__main__.A object at 0xb7d52f0c>>
    

    With a.class_foo, a is not bound to class_foo, rather the class A is bound to class_foo.

    print(a.class_foo)
    # <bound method type.class_foo of <class '__main__.A'>>
    

    Here, with a staticmethod, even though it is a method, a.static_foo just returns a good 'ole function with no arguments bound. static_foo expects 1 argument, and a.static_foo expects 1 argument too.

    print(a.static_foo)
    # <function static_foo at 0xb7d479cc>
    

    And of course the same thing happens when you call static_foo with the class A instead.

    print(A.static_foo)
    # <function static_foo at 0xb7d479cc>
    
    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(23条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 fesafe材料库问题
  • ¥35 beats蓝牙耳机怎么查看日志
  • ¥15 Fluent齿轮搅油
  • ¥15 八爪鱼爬数据为什么自己停了
  • ¥15 交替优化波束形成和ris反射角使保密速率最大化
  • ¥15 树莓派与pix飞控通信
  • ¥15 自动转发微信群信息到另外一个微信群
  • ¥15 outlook无法配置成功
  • ¥30 这是哪个作者做的宝宝起名网站
  • ¥60 版本过低apk如何修改可以兼容新的安卓系统