胖鸭 2010-01-26 23:52
浏览 379
已采纳

为什么在 llvm 上没有好的方案 / lisp?

There is Gambit Scheme, MIT Scheme, PLT Scheme, Chicken Scheme, Bigloo, Larceny, ...; then there are all the lisps.

Yet, there's not (to my knowledge) a single popular scheme/lisp on LLVM, even though LLVM provides lots of nice things like:

  • easier to generate code than x86
  • easy to make C FFI calls ...

So why is it that there isn't a good scheme/lisp on LLVM?

转载于:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2143605/why-isnt-there-a-good-scheme-lisp-on-llvm

  • 写回答

9条回答 默认 最新

  • 胖鸭 2010-01-26 23:59
    关注

    LLVM provides a lot, but it's still only a small part of the runtime a functional language needs. And C FFI calls are uncomplicated because LLVM leaves memory management to be handled by someone else. Interacting the Garbage Collector is what makes FFI calls difficult in languages such as Scheme.

    You might be interested in HLVM, but it's still more than experimental at this point.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(8条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥50 如何增强飞上天的树莓派的热点信号强度,以使得笔记本可以在地面实现远程桌面连接
  • ¥15 MCNP里如何定义多个源?
  • ¥20 双层网络上信息-疾病传播
  • ¥50 paddlepaddle pinn
  • ¥20 idea运行测试代码报错问题
  • ¥15 网络监控:网络故障告警通知
  • ¥15 django项目运行报编码错误
  • ¥15 STM32驱动继电器
  • ¥15 Windows server update services
  • ¥15 关于#c语言#的问题:我现在在做一个墨水屏设计,2.9英寸的小屏怎么换4.2英寸大屏