dss087358 2012-04-17 00:25
浏览 76
已采纳

用php拉取Instagram信息 - 解码然后呢?

I'm pulling json from the Instagram API using a curl request. I want to cache this json to use from a mapping application (javascript).

Should I just pull straight from the API and cache the json, or is there some advantage to decoding it, doing something with the data, then re-encoding the json?

I was explaining this situation to a developer friend and he said something about decoding, cycling through the data, then re-encoding.

Other than changing the format of the data somehow -- which I thought of doing but decided to do client-side instead -- what's the advantage of doing it this way?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • douxiluan6555 2012-04-17 00:37
    关注

    There is no right or wrong to what you ask. I'd say the following:

    1. Cache the request: Caching the remote-request is most often useful, especially as you develop. You don't stress the remote server and you have responses nearly immediately at hand.
    2. Caching the data-processing can make sense, too. Normally the actual data-processing does not take longer than the original request, but processing caching is known to be very useful as well for processing that take it's times.
    3. Doing both - with different time-out configurations - is probably the high art of caching, but keep in mind that caching to work out best should be dead-simple. Processing caching can be normally neglected if you do already front-end caching, e.g. if you put your website behind a reverse-proxy (nginx, varnish).

    There is no black or white, what's most important with caching: Do what works best for you.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 乌班图ip地址配置及远程SSH
  • ¥15 怎么让点阵屏显示静态爱心,用keiluVision5写出让点阵屏显示静态爱心的代码,越快越好
  • ¥15 PSPICE制作一个加法器
  • ¥15 javaweb项目无法正常跳转
  • ¥15 VMBox虚拟机无法访问
  • ¥15 skd显示找不到头文件
  • ¥15 机器视觉中图片中长度与真实长度的关系
  • ¥15 fastreport table 怎么只让每页的最下面和最顶部有横线
  • ¥15 java 的protected权限 ,问题在注释里
  • ¥15 这个是哪里有问题啊?