dongyong6045 2016-03-20 21:51
浏览 39
已采纳

为什么Pimple工厂方法会返回相同的实例?

I am using the factory method of Pimple, but it's returning same instance every time.

$container = new \Pimple\Container();

echo '<pre>';

$container['test'] = $container->factory(function( $c ) {
  $services = new \Pimple\Container();

  return $services;
} );

// Both outputs string(32) "0000000061066681000000005c9b6294"
var_dump( spl_object_hash( $container['test'] ) );
var_dump( spl_object_hash( $container['test'] ) );

It's the exact behavior I don't expect given the definition of the method saying it gives a new instance every time.

I'm on PHP 7.0.4 and my composer file for pimple is marked at ^3.0.0

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dongmeiba6151 2017-08-06 21:29
    关注

    Pimple does not return the same instance, but for some known reason those hashes are exactly the same. This is not something related to Pimple, but related to spl_object_hash and how PHP handles objects internally. Quoting this user contributed note, the part that answers your question is in bold:

    Note that the contents (properties) of the object are NOT hashed by the function, merely its internal handle and handler table pointer. This is sufficient to guarantee that any two objects simultaneously co-residing in memory will have different hashes. Uniqueness is not guaranteed between objects that did not reside in memory simultaneously, for example:

    var_dump(spl_object_hash(new stdClass()), spl_object_hash(new stdClass()));

    Running this alone will usually generate the same hashes, since PHP reuses the internal handle for the first stdClass after it has been dereferenced and destroyed when it creates the second stdClass.

    So this is because you're not keeping a reference to returned objects. You just create them, print their hashes and then PHP throws them out of memory. For a better understanding of this note, try to keep those instances in memory by assigning them to variables ($ref1 and $ref2 here):

    $container = new \Pimple\Container();
    
    $container['test'] = $container->factory(function( $c ) {
      $services = new \Pimple\Container();
    
      return $services;
    } );
    
    // Outputs different object hashes
    print( spl_object_hash( $ref1 = $container['test'] ) );
    print "
    ";
    
    print( spl_object_hash( $ref2 = $container['test'] ) );
    print "
    ";
    

    There is also a note in spl_object_hash documentation that says:

    Note:

    When an object is destroyed, its hash may be reused for other objects.

    So this is not some strange behavior.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 数学建模招标中位数问题
  • ¥15 phython路径名过长报错 不知道什么问题
  • ¥15 深度学习中模型转换该怎么实现
  • ¥15 HLs设计手写数字识别程序编译通不过
  • ¥15 Stata外部命令安装问题求帮助!
  • ¥15 从键盘随机输入A-H中的一串字符串,用七段数码管方法进行绘制。提交代码及运行截图。
  • ¥15 TYPCE母转母,插入认方向
  • ¥15 如何用python向钉钉机器人发送可以放大的图片?
  • ¥15 matlab(相关搜索:紧聚焦)
  • ¥15 基于51单片机的厨房煤气泄露检测报警系统设计