doudi5892 2017-01-01 16:53
浏览 50

按id和父排序php数组

I have an array of arrays - each has own id and parent id values. I want to sort it so that every child should be beneath it's parent. Let me show You my code:

Given Array:

$arr = array(array('id' => 15, 'parent' => 12), 
array('id' => 10, 'parent' => 12), 
array('id' => 12, 'parent' => 12), 
array('id' => 17, 'parent' => 12), 
array('id' => 21, 'parent' => 15), 
array('id' => 13, 'parent' => 15), 
array('id' => 15, 'parent' => 15), 
array('id' => 25, 'parent' => 15), 
array('id' => 7, 'parent' => 7), 
array('id' => 18, 'parent' => 7), 
array('id' => 4, 'parent' => 7), 
array('id' => 1, 'parent' => 3), 
array('id' => 5, 'parent' => 5), 
array('id' => 2, 'parent' => 7));

How the output should look like (asc by parents, every children also ascending - always under parent (parent always as first!!!)):

      0 =>
          'id' => int 1
          'parent' => int 3
      1 =>
          'id' => int 5
          'parent' => int 5
      2 =>
          'id' => int 7
          'parent' => int 7
      3 =>
          'id' => int 2
          'parent' => int 7
      4 =>
          'id' => int 4
          'parent' => int 7
      5 =>
          'id' => int 18
          'parent' => int 7
      6 =>
          'id' => int 12
          'parent' => int 12
      7 =>
          'id' => int 10
          'parent' => int 12
      8 =>
          'id' => int 15
          'parent' => int 12
      9 =>
          'id' => int 17
          'parent' => int 12
      10 =>
          'id' => int 15
          'parent' => int 15
      11 =>
          'id' => int 13
          'parent' => int 15
      12 =>
          'id' => int 21
          'parent' => int 15
      13 =>
          'id' => int 25
          'parent' => int 15

Question: I'am wondering what is the easiest solution to achieve this ? I've managed to do that, but I cant stop the feeling that there is a way to do that in quicker and more optimal way..

Here is my code:

function groupByParent ($array)
{
    $groups = array();
    foreach ($array as $a) {
        $groups[$a['parent']][] = $a;
    }
    return $groups;
}
function insideSort ($array)
{
    foreach ($array as $k => $v) {
        usort($array[$k], function($a, $b){
           return $a['id'] == $b['parent'] ? -1 : 1;
        });
        $f = array_shift($array[$k]);
        sort($array[$k]);
        array_unshift($array[$k], $f);
    }
    return $array;
}
function finalSort($array)
{
    $final = array();
    foreach ($array as $a) {
        $final = array_merge($final, $a);
    }
    return $final;
}

$grr = groupByParent($arr);
$irr = insideSort($grr);
ksort($irr);
$res = finalSort($irr);

Is there easier way to achieve it ?

Cheers

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dongqian6484 2017-01-02 18:19
    关注

    Explanation

    Another way to sort the array, could be iterating through all elements in the array, and find all distinct parents, then store all siblings for each parent found, except for the once that has id same as parent. Then we sort it ascending and prepend the node that has id same as parent, to the start of the array.

    Big O notation

    The run time for this algorithm will have a best case of O(n), and a worst case of O(n^2).

    Code

    <?php
    
    $arr = array(
        array('id' => 15, 'parent' => 12), 
        array('id' => 10, 'parent' => 12), 
        array('id' => 12, 'parent' => 12), 
        array('id' => 17, 'parent' => 12), 
        array('id' => 21, 'parent' => 15), 
        array('id' => 13, 'parent' => 15), 
        array('id' => 15, 'parent' => 15), 
        array('id' => 25, 'parent' => 15), 
        array('id' => 7, 'parent' => 7), 
        array('id' => 18, 'parent' => 7), 
        array('id' => 4, 'parent' => 7), 
        array('id' => 1, 'parent' => 3), 
        array('id' => 5, 'parent' => 5), 
        array('id' => 2, 'parent' => 7)
    );
    
    /* Declare variables */
    $result = array();
    $temp = array();
    $parents = array();
    
    /* Get all distinct parents and sort ascending */
    for ($i = 0; $i < count($arr); $i++)
        if (!isset($temp[$arr[$i]['parent']]))
            $temp[$arr[$i]['parent']] = array();
    
    ksort($temp);
    
    /* Find all siblings with same parent */
    for ($i = 0; $i < count($arr); $i++)
        if ($arr[$i]['parent'] === $arr[$i]['id'])
            $parents[] = $arr[$i]['parent'];
        else
            $temp[$arr[$i]['parent']][$arr[$i]['id']] = true;
    
    /* Sort siblings ascending */
    foreach ($temp as $key => $value)
        ksort($temp[$key]);
    
    /* Prepend node where id is same as parent if existing */
    for ($i = 0; $i < count($parents); $i++)
        $temp[$parents[$i]] = array($parents[$i] => true) + $temp[$parents[$i]];
    
    /* Display properly */
    foreach ($temp as $key => $value)
        foreach ($temp[$key] as $subKey => $subValue)
            $result[] = array('id' => $subKey, 'parent' => $key);
    
    /* Output */
    print_r($result);
    
    ?>
    

    Execution time

    Execution time for my code:
    Execution 1: 0.00018095970153809
    Execution 2: 0.00018692016601562
    Execution 3: 0.00022411346435547
    Execution 4: 0.00018596649169922
    Execution 5: 0.00018620491027832
    Execution 6: 0.00018501281738281
    Execution 7: 0.00018501281738281
    Execution 8: 0.00018596649169922
    Execution 9: 0.00018095970153809
    Execution 10: 0.00020003318786621
    
    Average: 0.00019011497
    
    Execution time for your code:
    Execution 1: 0.00019311904907227
    Execution 2: 0.0001978874206543
    Execution 3: 0.00019693374633789
    Execution 4: 0.0001981258392334
    Execution 5: 0.0001990795135498
    Execution 6: 0.00028491020202637
    Execution 7: 0.00019598007202148
    Execution 8: 0.00019693374633789
    Execution 9: 0.0001978874206543
    Execution 10: 0.00019717216491699
    
    Average: 0.00020580291
    

    Result was found using microtime(true) at top and bottom of code and subtracting the end time from the start time.

    Conclusion

    So the code I provided is not neccessarily an easier way to achieve what you want, however it looks like it's a little bit more efficient especially when using small arrays like the one in the code above.

    I have not tested execution time on big arrays and would advice you to do so before choosing a solution.

    And if you manage to figure out a way to get rid of the "Display properly" part (line 48-50 in my code) and instead store the data properly from start to end, the execution time would improve alot.

    Good luck, and happy new year!

    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥20 java在应用程序里获取不到扬声器设备
  • ¥15 echarts动画效果的问题,请帮我添加一个动画。不要机器人回答。
  • ¥60 许可证msc licensing软件报错显示已有相同版本软件,但是下一步显示无法读取日志目录。
  • ¥15 Attention is all you need 的代码运行
  • ¥15 一个服务器已经有一个系统了如果用usb再装一个系统,原来的系统会被覆盖掉吗
  • ¥15 使用esm_msa1_t12_100M_UR50S蛋白质语言模型进行零样本预测时,终端显示出了sequence handled的进度条,但是并不出结果就自动终止回到命令提示行了是怎么回事:
  • ¥15 前置放大电路与功率放大电路相连放大倍数出现问题
  • ¥80 部署运行web自动化项目
  • ¥15 腾讯云如何建立同一个项目中物模型之间的联系
  • ¥30 VMware 云桌面水印如何添加