dpgkg42484 2015-06-08 04:47
浏览 191
已采纳

SSL操作失败,代码1:dh键太小

I am connecting to my database Google Cloud SQL via SSL. I use codeigniter 3.0 to do so, although the mysqli driver is a bit modified to allow this functionality.

It's been working well for months. However it just started to return this warning:

Message: mysqli::real_connect(): SSL operation failed with code 1. OpenSSL Error messages: error:14082174:SSL routines:SSL3_CHECK_CERT_AND_ALGORITHM:dh key too small

I'm assuming DH Key is too small is the main problem, but I have no idea what that means. I've googled Diffie–Hellman key exchange, along with the message "key too small" but I haven't had much luck.

Is this a sign that the keys on the server have been tampered with? I've checked the last-modified dates on them -- no abnormal recent access.

It could be that my server did some upgrading to PHP or their server configuration, which may result in this breaking, but I wanted to check and make sure that it wasn't something else.

Thanks for any insight / readable material on the subject.

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dsuoedtom207012191 2015-06-08 10:34
    关注
    ... error:14082174:SSL routines:SSL3_CHECK_CERT_AND_ALGORITHM:dh key too small
    

    The error number you are interested in is the OpenSSL error 0x14082174.

    The SSL3_CHECK_CERT_AND_ALGORITHM is usually seen when enabling export grade ciphers. It may be showing up again in non-export grade negotiations due to Logjam (see below).


    I'm assuming DH Key is too small is the main problem, but I have no idea what that means. I've googled Diffie–Hellman key exchange, along with the message "key too small" but I haven't had much luck.

    That's due to the recent Logjam attack from the paper Imperfect Forward Secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman Fails in Practice.

    You should use 2048-bit Diffie-Hellman groups or larger. You should not be using 512-bit or 1024-bit Diffie-Hellman groups.

    The first thing to check for is your cipher list string. It should be similar to:

    "HIGH:!aNULL:!MD5:!RC4"
    

    It will avoid the export grade ciphers, and use modern ciphers. But you will also need to ensure your DH callback is not using a weak/small field size. For that, you need to check the server configuration.


    Some folks are "solving" the issue with kRSA. kRSA is a key transport scheme, not a key agreement scheme. The RSA key transport scheme does not provide forward secrecy, and its use is usually discouraged. In fact, its going to be removed from TLS 1.3.

    I can only say "usually discouraged" because it depends on the data being protected. If you have SSL/TLS to guard downloads of a publicly available file, then its probably OK to use. If your website has a login, then its probably a little risky to use it because the password is secret data (unlike the publicly downloadable file).

    To avoid key transport and pass those Qualsys SSL Labs tests for web server configurations and forward secrecy, use:

    "HIGH:!aNULL:!kRSA:!MD5:!RC4"
    

    In your Apache configuration file, it would look like so:

    # cat /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf | grep SSLCipherSuite
    # SSLCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:!aNULL:!MD5
    SSLCipherSuite HIGH:!aNULL:!kRSA:!MD5:!RC4
    

    I seem to recall wget rejected small groups quite some time before the paper was released. It might make a good test case for your site.

    There's also an improved sslscan, which tests for lots of things. That might make a good QA tool, too.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥15 #MATLAB仿真#车辆换道路径规划
  • ¥15 java 操作 elasticsearch 8.1 实现 索引的重建
  • ¥15 数据可视化Python
  • ¥15 要给毕业设计添加扫码登录的功能!!有偿
  • ¥15 kafka 分区副本增加会导致消息丢失或者不可用吗?
  • ¥15 微信公众号自制会员卡没有收款渠道啊
  • ¥100 Jenkins自动化部署—悬赏100元
  • ¥15 关于#python#的问题:求帮写python代码
  • ¥20 MATLAB画图图形出现上下震荡的线条
  • ¥15 关于#windows#的问题:怎么用WIN 11系统的电脑 克隆WIN NT3.51-4.0系统的硬盘