Does it make sense to additionally use http.TimeoutHandler if I already set the server's ReadTimeout and WriteTimeout? It seems as if this scenario is mutually exclusive?
3条回答 默认 最新
- dongmi1995 2018-07-10 07:16关注
These two deal with different aspects of http request/response lifecycle.
http.TimeoutHandler
is used to limit execution time of the http.Handler. it will return503
status code to the client, ifhttp.Handler
doesn't finish in stipulated time.While,
ReadTimeout
andWriteTimeout
deals with network I/O timeout, i.e time required to read/write request/response body to your client respectively.So,
http.TimeoutHandler
handles the case where your handler (code block that handles http request) need to be complete in set amount of time, by wrapping your original handler. whilehttp.WriteTimeout
orhttp.ReadTimeout
is used when you dont want to wait for network read/write of request/response indefinitely.本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?解决 无用评论 打赏 举报
悬赏问题
- ¥15 如何在scanpy上做差异基因和通路富集?
- ¥20 关于#硬件工程#的问题,请各位专家解答!
- ¥15 关于#matlab#的问题:期望的系统闭环传递函数为G(s)=wn^2/s^2+2¢wn+wn^2阻尼系数¢=0.707,使系统具有较小的超调量
- ¥15 FLUENT如何实现在堆积颗粒的上表面加载高斯热源
- ¥30 截图中的mathematics程序转换成matlab
- ¥15 动力学代码报错,维度不匹配
- ¥15 Power query添加列问题
- ¥50 Kubernetes&Fission&Eleasticsearch
- ¥15 報錯:Person is not mapped,如何解決?
- ¥15 c++头文件不能识别CDialog