douhui4699 2014-04-24 12:27
浏览 23
已采纳

以高效的方式递归列出目录和文件

go's filepath.Walk says that

The files are walked in lexical order, which makes the output deterministic but means that for very large directories Walk can be inefficient. Walk does not follow symbolic links.

What are the other efficient ways to do the same?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dpw30157 2014-04-24 12:44
    关注

    There is no "efficient" way to do the same (walk in lexical order). You either have to sort (which is "inefficient") or walk in random order (which is not the same).

    Until you measured and using filepath.Walk really is your bottleneck you should not worry about the little word "inefficient". Especially as it does not state "it will be inefficient", just "can be". Can in the sense of: It is possible to craft 100k file names and put the into a manually crafted directory so that sorting them will take a long time.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥100 任意维数的K均值聚类
  • ¥15 stamps做sbas-insar,时序沉降图怎么画
  • ¥15 unity第一人称射击小游戏,有demo,在原脚本的基础上进行修改以达到要求
  • ¥15 买了个传感器,根据商家发的代码和步骤使用但是代码报错了不会改,有没有人可以看看
  • ¥15 关于#Java#的问题,如何解决?
  • ¥15 加热介质是液体,换热器壳侧导热系数和总的导热系数怎么算
  • ¥100 嵌入式系统基于PIC16F882和热敏电阻的数字温度计
  • ¥15 cmd cl 0x000007b
  • ¥20 BAPI_PR_CHANGE how to add account assignment information for service line
  • ¥500 火焰左右视图、视差(基于双目相机)