drvvepadi289421028
drvvepadi289421028
2018-11-13 18:15
浏览 314
已采纳

使用内联汇编程序用C调用golang函数时,对于'mov'的内存引用过多

I'm trying to call a golang function from my C code. Golang does not use the standard x86_64 calling convention, so I have to resort to implementing the transition myself. As gcc does not want to mix cdecl with the x86_64 convention, I'm trying to call the function using inline assembly:

void go_func(struct go_String filename, void* key, int error){
    void* f_address = (void*)SAVEECDSA;
    asm volatile("  sub     rsp, 0xe0;           \t
\
                    mov     [rsp+0xe0], rbp;   \t
\
                    mov     [rsp], %0;            \t
\
                    mov     [rsp+0x8], %1;       \t
\
                    mov    [rsp+0x18], %2;       \t
\
                    call    %3;                     \t
\
                    mov     rbp, [rsp+0xe0];   \t
\
                    add     rsp, 0xe0;"          
                    :
                    : "g"(filename.str), "g"(filename.len), "g"(key), "g"(f_address)
                    : );
    return;
}

Sadly the compiler always throws an error at me that I dont understand:

./code.c:241: Error: too many memory references for `mov'

This corresponds to this line: mov [rsp+0x18], %2; \t \ If I delete it, the compilation works. I don't understand what my mistake is...

I'm compiling with the -masm=intel flag so I use Intel syntax. Can someone please help me?

图片转代码服务由CSDN问答提供 功能建议

我正在尝试从我的C代码中调用golang函数。 Golang不使用标准的x86_64调用约定,因此我不得不自己实现过渡。 由于gcc不想将cdecl与x86_64约定混合使用, 我正尝试使用内联汇编调用该函数:

  void go_func(struct go_String filename,void * key  ,int error){
 void * f_address =(void *)SAVEECDSA; 
 asm volatile(“ sub rsp,0xe0; \ t 
 \
 mov [rsp + 0xe0],rbp; \ t 
 \\  n mov [rsp],%0; \ t 
 \
 mov [rsp + 0x8],%1; \ t 
 \
 mov [rsp + 0x18],%2; \ t 
 \
 调用%3; \ t 
 \
 mov rbp,[rsp + 0xe0]; \ t 
 \
添加rsp,0xe0;“ 
:
:” g“(filename.str),” g  “(filename.len),” g“(密钥),” g“(f_address)
:); 
返回; 
} 
   
 
 

可悲 编译器总是向我抛出一个我不明白的错误:

  ./ code.c:241:错误:`mo的内存引用过多 v'
   
 
 

这对应于以下行: mov [rsp + 0x18],%2; \ t \ 如果删除它,则编译有效。 我不明白我的错误是什么...

我正在使用-masm = intel标志进行编译,因此我使用Intel语法。 有人可以帮我吗?

  • 点赞
  • 写回答
  • 关注问题
  • 收藏
  • 邀请回答

2条回答 默认 最新

  • douhao2153
    douhao2153 2018-11-13 18:21
    已采纳

    A "g" constraint allows the compiler to pick memory or register, so obviously you'll end up with mov mem,mem if that happens. mov can have at most 1 memory operand. (Like all x86 instructions, at most one explicit memory operand is possible.)

    Use "ri" constraints for the inputs that will be moved to a memory destination, to allow register or immediate but not memory.

    Also, you're modifying RSP so you can't safely use memory source operands. The compiler is going to assume it can use addressing modes like [rsp+16] or [rsp-4]. So you can't use push instead of mov.


    You also need to declare clobbers on all the call-clobbered registers, because the function call will do that. (Or better, maybe ask for the inputs in those call-clobbered registers so the compiler doesn't have to bounce them through call-preserved regs like RBX. But you need to make those operands read/write or declare separate output operands for the same registers to let the compiler know they'll be modified.)

    So probably your best bet for efficiency is something like

    int ecx, edx, edi, esi; // dummy outputs as clobbers
    register int r8 asm("r8d");  // for all the call-clobbered regs in the calling convention
    register int r9 asm("r9d");
    register int r10 asm("r10d");
    register int r11 asm("r11d");
    // These are the regs for x86-64 System V.
    //  **I don't know what Go actually clobbers.**
    
    asm("sub  rsp, 0xe0
    \t"    // adjust as necessary to align the stack before a call
        // "push args in reverse order"
        "push  %[fn_len] 
    \t"
        "push  %[fn_str] 
    \t"
        "call 
    \t"
        "add   rsp, 0xe0 + 3*8 
    \t"  // pop red-zone skip space + pushed args
    
           // real output in RAX, and dummy outputs in call-clobbered regs
        : "=a"(retval), "=c"(ecx), "=d"(edx), "=D"(edi), "=S"(esi), "=r"(r8), "=r"(r9), "=r"(r10), "=r"(r11)
        : [fn_str] "ri" (filename.str), [fn_len] "ri" (filename.len), etc.  // inputs can use the same regs as dummy outputs
        :  "xmm0", "xmm1", "xmm2", "xmm3", "xmm4", "xmm5", "xmm6", "xmm7",  // All vector regs are call-clobbered
           "xmm8", "xmm9", "xmm10", "xmm11", "xmm12", "xmm13", "xmm14", "xmm15",
           "memory"  // if you're passing any pointers (even read-only), or the function accesses any globals,
                     // best to make this a compiler memory barrier
        );
    

    Notice that the output are not early-clobber, so the compiler can (at its option) use those registers for inputs, but we're not forcing it so the compiler is still free to use some other register or an immediate.

    Upon further discussion, Go functions don't clobber RBP, so there's no reason to save/restore it manually. The only reason you might have wanted to is that locals might use RBP-relative addressing modes, and older GCC made it an error to declare a clobber on RBP when compiling without -fomit-frame-pointer. (I think. Or maybe I'm thinking of EBX in 32-bit PIC code.)


    Also, if you're using the x86-64 System V ABI, beware that inline asm must not clobber the red-zone. The compiler assumes that doesn't happen and there's no way to declare a clobber on the red zone or even set -mno-redzone on a per-function basis. So you probably need to sub rsp, 128 + 0xe0. Or 0xe0 already includes enough space to skip the red-zone if that's not part of the callee's args.

    点赞 评论
  • dsh84723
    dsh84723 2018-11-21 22:26

    The original poster added this solution as an edit to their question:

    If someone ever finds this, the accepted answer does not help you when you try to call golang code with inline asm! The accepted answer only helps with my initial problem, which helped me to fix the golangcall. Use something like this:**

    void* __cdecl go_call(void* func, __int64 p1, __int64 p2, __int64 p3, __int64 p4){
        void* ret;
        asm volatile("  sub     rsp, 0x28;             \t
    \
                        mov     [rsp], %[p1];                      \t
    \
                        mov     [rsp+0x8], %[p2];                      \t
    \
                        mov     [rsp+0x10], %[p3];                      \t
    \
                        mov     [rsp+0x18], %[p4];                      \t
    \      
                        call    %[func_addr];               \t
    \
                        add     rsp, 0x28; "     
                        :
                        : [p1] "ri"(p1), [p2] "ri"(p2), 
                        [p3] "ri"(p3), [p4] "ri"(p4), [func_addr] "ri"(func)
                        : );
        return ret;
    }
    
    点赞 评论

相关推荐