I am currently trying to get used to TDD and on a current project I am working on I am trying to leverage AWS's Go SDK. Which is all fine and dandy and I have used it before but I am currently trying to mock the value that *ec2.DescribeVolumesOutput
sends.
Diving into the code I see this as what returns for *ec2.DescribeVolumesOutput
:
type DescribeVolumesOutput struct {
_ struct{} `type:"structure"`
// The NextToken value to include in a future DescribeVolumes request. When
// the results of a DescribeVolumes request exceed MaxResults, this value can
// be used to retrieve the next page of results. This value is null when there
// are no more results to return.
NextToken *string `locationName:"nextToken" type:"string"`
// Information about the volumes.
Volumes []*Volume `locationName:"volumeSet" locationNameList:"item" type:"list"`
}
Okay.. That's cool, but what I want to mock the output of must live inside of Volumes []*Volume
locationName:"volumeSet" locationNameList:"item" type:"list"` so let's go a little deeper and see what that is...
type Volume struct {
_ struct{} `type:"structure"`
// Information about the volume attachments.
Attachments []*VolumeAttachment `locationName:"attachmentSet" locationNameList:"item" type:"list"`
// The Availability Zone for the volume.
AvailabilityZone *string `locationName:"availabilityZone" type:"string"`
// The time stamp when volume creation was initiated.
CreateTime *time.Time `locationName:"createTime" type:"timestamp"`
// Indicates whether the volume will be encrypted.
Encrypted *bool `locationName:"encrypted" type:"boolean"`
// The number of I/O operations per second (IOPS) that the volume supports.
// For Provisioned IOPS SSD volumes, this represents the number of IOPS that
// are provisioned for the volume. For General Purpose SSD volumes, this represents
// the baseline performance of the volume and the rate at which the volume accumulates
// I/O credits for bursting. For more information, see Amazon EBS Volume Types
// (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/EBSVolumeTypes.html)
// in the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud User Guide.
//
// Constraints: Range is 100-16,000 IOPS for gp2 volumes and 100 to 64,000IOPS
// for io1 volumes, in most Regions. The maximum IOPS for io1 of 64,000 is guaranteed
// only on Nitro-based instances (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/instance-types.html#ec2-nitro-instances).
// Other instance families guarantee performance up to 32,000 IOPS.
//
// Condition: This parameter is required for requests to create io1 volumes;
// it is not used in requests to create gp2, st1, sc1, or standard volumes.
Iops *int64 `locationName:"iops" type:"integer"`
// The full ARN of the AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer master
// key (CMK) that was used to protect the volume encryption key for the volume.
KmsKeyId *string `locationName:"kmsKeyId" type:"string"`
// The size of the volume, in GiBs.
Size *int64 `locationName:"size" type:"integer"`
// The snapshot from which the volume was created, if applicable.
SnapshotId *string `locationName:"snapshotId" type:"string"`
// The volume state.
State *string `locationName:"status" type:"string" enum:"VolumeState"`
// Any tags assigned to the volume.
Tags []*Tag `locationName:"tagSet" locationNameList:"item" type:"list"`
// The ID of the volume.
VolumeId *string `locationName:"volumeId" type:"string"`
// The volume type. This can be gp2 for General Purpose SSD, io1 for Provisioned
// IOPS SSD, st1 for Throughput Optimized HDD, sc1 for Cold HDD, or standard
// for Magnetic volumes.
VolumeType *string `locationName:"volumeType" type:"string" enum:"VolumeType"`
}
Nice! this looks like some data that I want to mock the values of!
But over the last couple of days I have had no luck in actually mocking these values. Are they so nested that this type of mocking is not worth the effort? Even trying to use the github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/ec2/ec2iface
does not seem to help me wrap my head around how to properly package some mock value returns to test. Am I coming at TDD all wrong? am I missing something super obvious? I do not really have example code to show since I now no longer understand what I am trying to do.
Does anyone possibly have an example of how they have mocked this?