duanjiao6730 2016-12-22 06:55
浏览 417
已采纳

Golang:当只有一名作者使用atomic.StoreInt32更改值时,是否需要在多个读取器中使用atomic.LoadInt32?

As the title says. basically what I'm wondering is that will the atomic.StoreInt32 also lock read operation while it's writing?

Another relative question:, is atomic.StoreUint64(&procRate, procCount) equivalent to atomic.StoreUint64(&procRate, atomic.LoadUint64(&procCount))?

Thanks in advance.

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dsd30433 2016-12-22 15:19
    关注

    Yes, you need to use atomic operations when you are both loading and storing the same value. The race detector should warn you about this.

    As for the second question, if the procCount value is also being used concurrently, then you still need to load it using an atomic operation. These two are not equivalent:

    atomic.StoreUint64(&procRate, procCount)
    atomic.StoreUint64(&procRate, atomic.LoadUint64(&procCount))
    

    The former reads procCount directly to pass to StoreUint64, while the latter passes a copy safely obtained via LoadUint64.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥20 腾讯企业邮箱邮件可以恢复么
  • ¥15 有人知道怎么将自己的迁移策略布到edgecloudsim上使用吗?
  • ¥15 错误 LNK2001 无法解析的外部符号
  • ¥50 安装pyaudiokits失败
  • ¥15 计组这些题应该咋做呀
  • ¥60 更换迈创SOL6M4AE卡的时候,驱动要重新装才能使用,怎么解决?
  • ¥15 让node服务器有自动加载文件的功能
  • ¥15 jmeter脚本回放有的是对的有的是错的
  • ¥15 r语言蛋白组学相关问题
  • ¥15 Python时间序列如何拟合疏系数模型