dsh1956
2013-10-18 02:22
浏览 909
已采纳

C ++:提高ifstream二进制文件的读取速度

I am rewriting small program from PHP to C++. The idea is basically to read through 32Gb file on an SSD and do some simple operations on it.

I am using Visual Studio 2012 with x64 release build. PHP is 5.3 32bit.

The problem is that bare reading speed in PHP is higher, than in C++, and this really puzzles me. PHP does ~350 Mb/s and C++/ifstream code does 180 Mb/sec.

Code is really simple:

ifstream datafile("data.txt", ios::binary);

while(datafile.read((char*)buffer, data_per_chunk)) {
//  do stuff;

I've tried different buffer sizes up to 16Mb and it did little difference. I also tried to set internal buffer via datafile.rdbuf()->pubsetbuf(...) but it also didn't made a difference.

Is there any hints on how to speed ifstream up without reverting to ancient C-level interface? I would like to at least reach PHP level of performance. Maybe some fancy read-ahead / cache settings or something.

I understand that memory-mapped files could likely help, but would prefer to tweak settings of ifstream, if it's possible to keep things simple given that file is significantly larger than physical RAM and larger than 4Gb i.e. no-go for potential 32-bit builds.

图片转代码服务由CSDN问答提供 功能建议

我正在将小程序从PHP重写为C ++。 这个想法基本上是通过SSD读取32Gb文件并对其进行一些简单的操作。

我正在使用带有x64版本构建的Visual Studio 2012。 PHP是5.3 32位。

问题是PHP中的读取速度比C ++中的读取速度快,这真让我感到困惑。 PHP大约350 Mb / s,C ++ / ifstream代码执行180 Mb /秒。

代码非常简单:

  ifstream datafile  (“data.txt”,ios :: binary); 
 
while(datafile.read((char *)buffer,data_per_chunk)){
 // do stuff; 
   \  n 
 

我尝试过不同的缓冲区大小,最高可达16Mb,并没有什么区别。 我也尝试通过datafile.rdbuf() - > pubsetbuf(...)设置内部缓冲区,但它也没有什么区别。

有没有关于如何在不恢复古老的C级界面的情况下加速ifstream的提示? 我想至少达到PHP级别的性能。 也许一些花哨的预读/缓存设置或其他东西。

据我所知,内存映射文件可能会有所帮助,但是如果可以保持简单,只要文件比物理RAM大得多并且大于物理RAM,则更愿意调整ifstream的设置。 4Gb即不用于潜在的32位版本。

  • 写回答
  • 好问题 提建议
  • 关注问题
  • 收藏
  • 邀请回答

2条回答 默认 最新

  • dp13668681869 2013-10-18 19:12
    已采纳

    It appeared that you can reach maximum SSD reading speed even with ifstream.

    To do so, you need to set internal ifstream readbuffer to ~2Mb, which is where peak SSD read speed happening, while fitting nicely in L2 cache of CPU. Then you need to readout data in chunks smaller than internal buffer. I've got best results reading data in 8-16kB chunks, but it only about 1% faster than reading in 1Mb chunks.

    Setting ifstream internal buffer:

    ifstream datafile("base.txt", ios::binary);
    datafile.rdbuf()->pubsetbuf(iobuf, sizeof iobuf);
    

    With all these tweaks I've got 495 Mb/sec read speed which is close to theoretical maximum of M500 480Gb SSD. During execution CPU load was 5%, which means that it was not really limited by ifstream implementation overhead.

    I found no observable speed difference between ifstream and std::basic_filebuf.

    已采纳该答案
    评论
    解决 无用
    打赏 举报
  • dongshi9407 2013-10-18 02:27

    I don't see the point of using ifstream when you're reading it all into a buffer. Either basic_filebuf or the "ancient" C interface will work. You need to compare ifstream to the C interface first, so that you know it's really ifstream to blame.

    I see the following options, in order of increasing performance:

    • std::ifstream: read, etc.
    • std::basic_filebuf: open, sgetn, etc.
    • C: fopen, fread, etc.
    • WinApi: CreateFile (not OpenFile!), ReadFileEx, etc.

    Perhaps PHP is not using the C interface internally, but winapi, and that is where the difference comes from.

    评论
    解决 无用
    打赏 举报

相关推荐 更多相似问题