douwojiao5919 2009-04-28 01:52
浏览 100
已采纳

Xdebug探查器和xdebug_time_index()给出不同的值

I used Xdebug to profile my PHP application.

When I open the generated profile file with WinCacheGrind, it gives me a total cumulative time of 3ms for {main} (0.003s).

However, when I use the function xdebug_time_index() at the end of my code, it returns a time of 0.03s.

Anyone knows what might cause this difference and which one is more representative ?

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • dongpeihui1051 2009-04-28 05:40
    关注

    Any chance adding that function actually increases the time needed?

    Also, I can imagine the profiler will actually start running when PHP runs (time index 0) while XDebug's internal counter can start a bit earlier.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥100 set_link_state
  • ¥15 虚幻5 UE美术毛发渲染
  • ¥15 CVRP 图论 物流运输优化
  • ¥15 Tableau online 嵌入ppt失败
  • ¥100 支付宝网页转账系统不识别账号
  • ¥15 基于单片机的靶位控制系统
  • ¥15 真我手机蓝牙传输进度消息被关闭了,怎么打开?(关键词-消息通知)
  • ¥15 装 pytorch 的时候出了好多问题,遇到这种情况怎么处理?
  • ¥20 IOS游览器某宝手机网页版自动立即购买JavaScript脚本
  • ¥15 手机接入宽带网线,如何释放宽带全部速度