dqd72925 2014-03-05 11:05
浏览 123
已采纳

Go可以保证常量地址吗?

Given an object obj is there a guarantee that

uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&obj))

will always evaluate to the same value regardless of when it is called?

Of course, Go guarantees that if you take two pointers to the same object, they will always compare equal. It might be possible though that an implementation moves an object in memory and transparently updates all pointers to it.

This is interesting if you consider garbage collection strategies like Mark-and-Compact. Would an implementor be allowed to use such a garbage collection strategy?

  • 写回答

3条回答 默认 最新

  • douzhi0107 2014-03-05 21:28
    关注

    There is no such guarantee, exactly so that it is possible to implement a moving collector.

    In fact, although the garbage collector does not move heap objects today, in Go 1.3 stacks can move when needing to grow, so it is entirely possible that

    var obj int
    fmt.Println(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&obj)))
    bigFunc()
    fmt.Println(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&obj)))
    

    will print two different pointers, because bigFunc grew the stack, causing obj and everything else on the stack to move.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论
查看更多回答(2条)

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥20 有关区间dp的问题求解
  • ¥15 多电路系统共用电源的串扰问题
  • ¥15 slam rangenet++配置
  • ¥15 有没有研究水声通信方面的帮我改俩matlab代码
  • ¥15 对于相关问题的求解与代码
  • ¥15 ubuntu子系统密码忘记
  • ¥15 信号傅里叶变换在matlab上遇到的小问题请求帮助
  • ¥15 保护模式-系统加载-段寄存器
  • ¥15 电脑桌面设定一个区域禁止鼠标操作
  • ¥15 求NPF226060磁芯的详细资料