drngnh708353 2017-02-07 10:38
浏览 71
已采纳

什么是使用ini_set()的PSR-1兼容替代方案?

I am in the process of making my code base PSR-2 compliant (and therefore PSR-1 compliant) and I have come across the following code:

public function init()
{
    parent::init();

    // Allow A Larger PHP Memory Limit For This Script
    ini_set("memory_limit", "512M");

    // Allow A Larger Script Execution Limit For This Script
    ini_set('max_execution_time', 300);
}

Which is used to increase the amount of memory and execution time which this particular script (which is only accessible to site admin and run infrequently) is able to consume.

Setting the default memory_limit and max_execution_time in php.ini (which will be honoured by all standard scripts/files) and then increasing those limits as and when needed, certainly feels like a perfectly acceptable and logical implementation to me.

However, I remember that PSR-1 states that:

"Files SHOULD either declare symbols (classes, functions, constants, etc.) or cause side-effects (e.g. generate output, change .ini settings, etc.) but SHOULD NOT do both."

It then goes on to state that using ini_set() is an example of a side-effect (at least their example shows it being used outside the scope of a class or function):

<?php
// side effect: change ini settings
ini_set('error_reporting', E_ALL);

This documentation can be seen here

My questions are therefore:

  1. Is the use of ini_set() within a classes method (as per my context) an example of a side-effect?
  2. If so, what is the PSR-1 compliant alternative?

This particular script needs to be allowed greater memory usage and execution time, but I do not want to just increase the global php.ini settings for this as that would allow for all other PHP processes to use more memory and execution time that they should.

  • 写回答

1条回答 默认 最新

  • doujionggan9570 2017-02-07 10:46
    关注

    PSR-1 is just talking about the top-level code in the file. That top-level code should either be causing side effects or declaring things.

    In your example, you're defining a class and its methods. The side effect doesn't happen when loading the file, it happens when you call the function. To be PSR-1 compliant, that call should not be in the top-level code of this file.

    本回答被题主选为最佳回答 , 对您是否有帮助呢?
    评论

报告相同问题?

悬赏问题

  • ¥20 R语言单细胞测序 对seurat对象进行标准化时出现问题
  • ¥15 Anaconda navigator updateor一直更新
  • ¥15 请问如何在matlab里使用raven工具?
  • ¥100 关于ios手游充值到一定金额,再点充值提示公众号的问题。
  • ¥15 求一个stm32串口控制程序
  • ¥20 Windows 驱动开发版本疑问相关
  • ¥15 MAC 未能打开磁盘映像
  • ¥15 fastcap使用,二维导体输入问题
  • ¥15 hosts修改后不能访问
  • ¥15 关于化学反应速率C++编译问题/FLUENT