This is my model:
namespace App\Models\Admin;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\SoftDeletes;
class Image extends Model
{
use SoftDeletes;
//table
protected $table = 'images';
}
If I add my trait I cannot find any record if I use my model like this:
$imageFile = ImageModel::where('id', 12)->first();
The $imageFile is always null, if I remove my trait is working . Why ???
分享 From what you've said, it is working as intended. When you use the soft-delete trait in Laravel, the model is NOT deleted from the DB. When you pass the model to destroy(), the only thing that happens is that the deleted_at field becomes non-null.
If you look deeper into Laravel's code, when you call
ImageModel::where('id', 12)->first();
the softdelete trait is adding
where null
to the SQL for the deleted_at column. This means that, as you said, if you turn off the trait, $imageFile will not be null (it is working). Because the softdelete never deleted the model from the DB - it just added a non-null value to the DB for that model and is thus visible to a normal laravel query: when you don't use softdeletes, Laravel doesn't care about the deleted_at field so it sees the model. When you turn softdeletes on, it looks for null values only, and because your model was softdeleted (it has a non-null value), it returns $imageFile as null.
As bytewave said, to properly use the softdeletes to NOT return a null value to $imageFile, you would need to add in the softdeleted models to your query like so:
Image::withTrashed()->where('id', 12')->first();
I think you were looking for slightly different functionality (a roll-back), which is a little different from the softdelete trait's intention. The manual is pretty good: 5.4 soft-deletes, but looking deeper into the trait code might help as well.
Take a look at the ->restore() function as well - this might help you get closer to the intended roll-back you were looking for. But, you need the logic up-front first to know which were deleted.
分享
